A path through philosophy
How do we know anything?
What can we really know, and how — through reason, the senses, or not at all?
Every claim to knowledge invites the question: how do you know? Trace the contest between reason and experience — and the skeptics who doubted both — across Greece, India, and modern Europe.
- 1
Wisdom begins in knowing that you know nothing; relentless questioning exposes false certainty.
- 2
- 3
- 4
The skeptic's answer: for every claim there is an equal counter-claim, so suspend judgement — and find peace.
- 5
In India, a parallel science of knowledge: only two valid means — perception and inference — sharpened by the Buddhist logicians.
Responding tothe Nyāya realists
- 6
Certainty is found within: even in doubt, 'if I am deceived, I exist' — and eternal truths require divine illumination.
Responding tothe skeptics
- 7
Systematic doubt strips away every uncertain belief until certainty is refounded — anticipating Descartes by centuries.
Responding tothe philosophers' overreach
- 8
I can doubt everything except that I am thinking: 'I think, therefore I am' becomes the foundation of knowledge.
Responding toskepticism
- 9
The mind is a blank slate; all ideas come from experience — there are no innate ideas.
Responding toDescartes' innate ideas
- 10
Pushes empiricism to its limit: we never observe causation, only habit, and reason cannot justify induction.
- 11
Both sides are half right: the mind supplies the forms (space, time, cause), experience supplies the content — so knowledge is real, but only of appearances.
Responding toHume, who 'woke me from dogmatic slumber'
- 12
Return 'to the things themselves': describe the structures of consciousness and how objects are given, bracketing our assumptions.
Responding tothe impasse of realism and idealism
- 13
Meaning and knowledge live in language: our words get their sense from use in shared 'language games', not from private certainty.
Responding tothe Cartesian inner picture
- 14
We never prove theories at all; knowledge grows by bold conjecture and rigorous attempts at refutation.
Responding tothe quest for certainty